Total Pageviews
November 23, 2024
Print Media is dead - Nope - It is alive and kicking - Next level Flipkart interactive Rubbable first page ad in THE HINDUSTAN TIMES
November 20, 2024
Thunder Strikes again - A perfect Match between Thums Up and Allu Arjun's Pushpa's 2!!!
“Thunder striking soon,” the latest campaign of Thums Up, has a twist. One needs to see it twice to understand what it is conveying. Show it to a Caucasian American, and he would be nonplussed. He would understand it as a promo, but it would not make any sense to him.
But
for Indians and Indians throughout the world, it makes perfect sense. Thums Up has partnered with Allu Arjun; the Thums Up teaser is for the much-awaited movie Pushpa 2.
Does
it make sense? You bet it does. For Allu Arjun, who is endorsing Thums Up, it
is free publicity for his movie. For Thums Up, the teaser gets tremendous
eyeballs, and the image that Allu Arjun portrays in the movie matches the
positioning tack that Thums Up has consistently used.
The
positioning is that of a macho man who wants the strongest cola in the market.
And even better if that strong man borders on the line between lawfulness and lawlessness. That is Sona Pe Suhaga (That is the icing on the cake). The
present generation wants to be a rebel—with a cause or without. A perfect
marriage between the brand, its positioning, the brand ambassador, his
on-screen image, and movie promotion.
March 28, 2024
Common Sense is not common, Thums Up Should have done this 30 years ago.
Common sense is not common. This we Hyderabadis knew for generations. So much so that Coca-Cola had five zones, North, South, East West and, Hyderabad.
After a heavy Biryani nothing like a nice "Thanda Toofan". It is not a cool drink it is Tumps Up. Pity that Ramesh Chauhan sold the brand to CocaCòla. It would have given a run for the money both for Coke and Pepsi.
The point is why wait for so long. This ad should have been released twenty years ago.
September 20, 2023
Vespa Scooter - Positioning Strategy
Vespa Scooter The Ultimate in Positioning
May 02, 2022
peyTM - Sweat Pants - Fake products that imitate famous brands - Any thing goes!
Very interesting, one of my colleagues is wearing trousers with the brand name Peytm. Classic case of fake/Spurious brands that imitate famous brands and the audacity of Indian manufacturers to get away with such practices!
The funniest part is that Paytm is an E-wallet company and is not a clothing brand. But in a world full of clutter, Paytm is a clutter cutter and it has a huge recall. And there are enough predatory vultures to take care of any opportunity to get a free promotional ride.
Comments:
Raghavendra Raghavender Matam: And it's Sweat too!
Anil Ramesh: PeyTm sweat is copycat's sugar syrup, Raghavendra Raghavender Matam!
Vijay Arjun Veeravalli: But Did he buy checking the brand name on that. I don't think so.
Sharma Ji Ka Samosa - Eat it and have a instant Orgasm - strange product Promotion
April 28, 2022
Akshay Kumar goes back on Vimal Pan Masala ad campaign - Surrogate Advertising!
April 21st
Classic case of having the cake and eating it too.
What Bloody Hypocrisy! First, the 50+ actor endorses the tobacco-based product ("I don't know that it has tobacco!?").
Then his fans howl in protest and to avoid the backlash pesto says that he will withdraw and will not endorse any such products in the future.
He also says that the endorsement money will be given for a "WORTHY CAUSE".
At the bottom of the same post, it says the brand will continue to air the advertisement.
When will we realize that our reel heroes are not real heroes? They have feet of clay that will melt at the first instance.
Comments:
Niketha Nigam: The product doesn't have tobacco but this brand majorly deals in pan masala products. They are just doing surrogate advertising. Casting 3 top most expensive actors for selling elaichi 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Raj Sampat: I m doing business of Vimal pan masala, first of all Vimal is not tobacco, so cut out miss confession of the product...
Anil Ramesh: Surrogate advertising Raj Sampat like Niketa Nigam said. Surrogate advertising itself is a dubious way of promoting a product.
Raj Sampat: Anil Ramesh on the packet itself they have written pan masala
Anil Ramesh: Raj Sampat, check this out.
When former James Bond star Pierce Brosnan faced flak last year for appearing in an advertisement for Pan Bahar, a mouth freshener, a spokesperson for the manufacturer argued that the outrage was the result of “public misconception” since he explained, the company didn’t “produce either gutka or pan masala.”
Ashok and Co, the company that produces Pan Bahar, does manufacture pan masala. It only doesn’t add tobacco to the sachet, because state governments started banning all food products containing tobacco after new regulations were framed in this regard in 2011.
While it is true that the actor was only endorsing a mouth freshener, the ‘misconception’, seems to be less a fault of the public and more a deliberate strategy by companies like Ashok and Co, who use tobacco-less products to market and sell tobacco products. Welcome to the world of surrogate advertisements – where the product being advertised is only a front for selling another product, usually a banned one.
Those manufacturing smokeless tobacco products have been resorting to this strategy for a long time now. So when you see Ajay Devgn promoting Vimal Pan Masala or Priyanka Chopra promoting Rajnigandha Pearls, both of which don’t have tobacco or nicotine, you must understand that they are not just selling pearls, they are selling something else too – a brand name that’s also associated with tobacco-containing products. It is a strategy used by most companies, done with the aim to sidestep laws that restrict the manufacture, sale, and advertising of these products.
In 2003, for example, the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) banned all direct or indirect advertisements of any tobacco products, except at the point of sale, storage, or manufacturing. A study conducted soon after found that the “annual cost of advertisement of plain Pan Parag on two television channels alone is 3.8 times its annual sale value.”
Were they running the company into loss then? Not really, if the tobacco-containing Pan Parag made up for the remaining expenses on advertising on Pan Parag and generated profits on top of that. “This indicates that the Pan Parag pan masala advertisements are a surrogate for the tobacco product (gutka) the company manufactures under the same brand name,” the researchers had to conclude in the study, which gave sufficient leeway to the company.
What seems to have come to the aid of manufacturers is another law that has really helped them sidestep the previously stated laws. The amended cable television network rules allow the usage of the brand name and logo of a tobacco product, subject to a few conditions, provided the product being sold does not contain tobacco. This has been used ingeniously by the manufacturers of the tobacco-containing pan masala or gutkha.
For instance, according to its own website, the pan masala Ashok and Co manufacturers went through three phases – selling pan masala without tobacco until 1988, then with tobacco, and after 2011, again without tobacco. However, the brand names for the pan masala — ‘Begum’, ‘Natkhat’, ‘Wah’, and ‘Dilruba’ — continued to be the same.
If the manufacturer could get the brand name stuck in the consumers’ minds, at a shop, they only had to choose whether the pan masala they wanted was with or without tobacco. If they chose a pan masala with tobacco, the nicotine in it would do the rest of the trick. Even if they were driven to the shop to buy a tobaccoless product, advertising tobacco at the shop itself wasn’t banned. The manufacturers had ensured that advertisements continued to reach consumers. But the Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition & Restrictions on Sales) Regulations, 2011, banned any food products containing tobacco and nicotine from markets, effectively banning even the production of tobacco-containing pan masala and gutkha. Any allegations, as the spokesperson for Ashok and Co would say, of surrogate advertisements would be meaningless if manufacturers couldn’t make the product that they are accused of surreptitiously marketing. Except, just like manufacturers found a way to work around the 2003 ban on advertisements, they have found a way to circumvent the 2011 manufacturing ban.
Only about a fortnight before Brosnan landed in the Pan Bahar controversy, the Supreme Court had revisited a submission by the health ministry that explained how the 2011 regulations were being flouted. The ministry had informed the court that “manufacturers are selling pan masala (without tobacco) with flavoured chewing tobacco in separate sachets”, which are often “sold together by the same vendors from the same premises.”
The spokesperson for Ashok & Co had told the BBC at the time of the controversy that they had chosen Brosnan because he is “suave, cool and a master-blender.” There couldn’t a better PR statement. The pan masala manufacturers’ plan of selling twin gutkha packs to be mixed as one, and advertising it through a tobaccoless product of the same brand name, requires a lot of mix-up or mixing. It is a master blender of a plan.
These surrogate advertisements too are then a health risk because every fifth adult uses smokeless tobacco in India, and perhaps more are gravitating towards it due to celebrity endorsement. A WHO monograph in fact argues that more than half of oral cancers are caused by smokeless tobacco. The clandestine production and sale of these products is something that perhaps only the government can stop – a process that for now is being gradually pushed forward through litigation and might need rules that are framed in a better manner. However, that this process does happen is something a casual visit to your local cigarette and paan shop will easily reveal.
If celebrities still endorse these products, it shows that they don’t mind being part of this cunning and dangerous trade. They can’t plead ignorance. Brosnan at least took a stand against Ashok and Co after facing criticism, but that didn’t stop the company from using the advertisement. When the Delhi government wrote to a bunch of actors that today participate in such surrogate advertising of smokeless tobacco, only Sunny Leone cared to reply and agreed to not endorse the products. For others, a little moolah is all it takes to endanger lives.
Deepesh Agarwal: I believe one can’t undermine the power of a binding contract I believe sir (the actual reason why the ad won’t be taken down). I am not sure what he was thinking “ok I’ll endorse Vimal elaichi (not a to tobacco) and the public won’t notice the pseudo marketing”? I am mean grow up Akshay as I am not sure what you were thinking that Indian citizens are so innocent that they won’t realize what you are really trying to do here? It doesn’t matter if it is elaichi and not tobacco. At the end, the true test is how the advertisement is perceived by the general public. At least Ajay Devgan (still not a great example though) endorses Vimal knowing fully well the reputational risks (a lot of memes are already there) unlike this double standard and hypocrite guy!
Finding money on the Street - Plain lucky or is there a twist in the tail?
March 31, 2022
Brilliant TATA Punch Kaziranga series Ad campaign - Right on the Button
In contrast to what CRED did, the campaign of TATA is brilliant.
TATA unveiled their new car "TATA Punch Kaziranga series" during IPL 2022.
The campaign has a TATA Punch display in all the stadiums where the IPL matches are played.
A hoarding shaped like a rhinoceros emerges from the car.
Any batsman hitting the car or the hoarding featuring the rhinoceros directly and TATA would donate Rs 5,00,000/- to the Kaziranga National park.
Why Kaziranga? It is the home of the famous Indian one-horned Rhinoceros.
Way to go TATA, brilliant thought process!
November 30, 2021
Heart attack Grill – Anti- Marketing at its best!
In the world that we live in everything is available on a tap. Information
is so much in excess that people are jaded and experiences are no longer treasured.
Attention spans are incredibly low and are down to 8 seconds for the Generation
Z.
So, what should a marketer do? Normal Marketing will not work. What customers
want is a shock, that too a 1000-volt shock, that should jolt them, almost to
death!
Almost on cue we have Heart attack Grill, a restaurant from Los Vegas, USA.
Jon Basso the owner has created a controversy and built a restaurant around and
named it Heart attack Grill. Savour some of the unusual things that happen at
Heart Attack Grill that would pop our eye-balls out of their sockets,
1) Name itself a big shocker Heart Attack Grill – Challenges the customers!
2) The normal offering is a 9,982 Quadruple Bypass burger (almost 4 days calorie requirement for an average man) and
French fries cooked in fat, Jon Basso himself says "Don't come here every
day of the week; it'll kill you,'" How many owners dare say “don’t come every
day to my business/shop””.
3) The Owner calls himself a doctor, all male employees are called doctors
and all female employees are called nurses who dress seductively and appear to
be girls out of an adult magazine. The restaurant ambience is that of an
hospital!
4) All the customers have to wear a hospital gown before they start eating food.
5) Customers are called patients.
6)
The nurses are loved and are a huge attraction for the customers.
7)
Any one not finishing the food is spanked on the back side with a wooden
paddle by the “nurses”.
8) Payments are strictly cash only. (What is the guarantee that the
customer would survive the meal. What if he/she dies before the cheque is realized).
9) Patrons weighing more than 350 pounds (160 kgs) eat free! They have to
stand on a weighing scale that flashes their weight on a huge screen!
10) Heart Attack Grill’s tag line is "taste worth dying for,"
11) Nothing healthy is allowed, no lettuce on the Grill's burgers. No Diet
Coke, only full-sugared soda is sold.
12) The nurses wheel out "patients" who are able to down a
Quadruple Bypass Burger to their car in a wheelchair.
13)
Diners find themselves surrounded by posters that glorify obesity.
14)
An oversized pill bottle dangles above the bar where the “doctor” mixes
drinks and pours beer.
15) Their biggest, the octuple bypass burger, has 19,900 calories (almost 10
days calorie requirement for an average man) and contains nearly four pounds of
fat -filled meat.
16)
Full bottles of wine are served in IV bags, 3.4-ounce shots in pill
bottles, and Jello shots in syringes.
17) Two people considered to be spokespeople of the restaurant died due to
obesity-related conditions. The first, Blair River, died at the age of 29 in
2011 after a bout with the flu that had become fatal due to his obesity. River
is still pictured in many of the restaurant’s advertisements and décor.
18) A second spokesperson, John Alleman died at 52 in 2013 after suffering a
heart attack on the premises itself. He ate at the restaurant every day,
19)
The ashes of John Alleman and his ashes sit atop the bar, on display.
20) I am
speech less. People are craving for experiences that is out of the world and
they are ready to do anything to have that experience including risking their
own life whether it is eating at Heart Attack grill or trying out a dish of
FUGU fish (a dish that is so dangerous that, one has to sign a document of release
before sampling it). Every year more than 100 people die eating the deadly Fugu
fish!
November 20, 2021
The Cloak and Dagger world of OTT platforms!
Picture Credit https://pixabay.com/photos/secret-top-stamp-spy-army-3037639/
Covid-19 pandemic has triggered the OTT wave in
India. What was a trickle, turned into a flood and later into a raging tornado.
The OTT penetration which was first thought of and dismissed as an urban city phenomenon
took the country by storm.
OTT has become all-encompassing and threatens the very existence of a deep-rooted film distribution and viewing industry that
includes the omnipresent cinema halls or theatres. Many theatres are shutting
down and especially single screens will soon be like the Indian tiger, a fast-disappearing
species unless special protection status is accorded!
The OTT platforms boost a surfeit of content.
The major OTT platforms like NETFLIX, AMAZON PRIME, Disney Hotstar, Sony LIV, ZEE
5, AHA, and many others have so much content that it is mind-boggling and even
mind numbing. The content is so much that no viewer can watch
even 10% of it, even if he/she were to watch it for the entire day.
Apart from the surfeit of content, no one knows
exactly how the OTT platforms operate. Figures of hundreds of crores of rupees are
thrown about for getting a movie onboard but no one knows for sure.
There are whispers that most movies are on the
platform on a free basis and that the moviemakers are paid according to the
number of views just like KDP (Kindle Direct Publish) where the authors get
paid according to the number of page reads!
Unlike the movies that are released in theatres,
aired by satellite channels, or through YouTube no one knows exactly how many have
actually viewed a movie. The only indicator is the IMDB ratings that a movie generates.
And with the huge Indian population, IMDB rating can be skewed and can be boosted
by encouraging the viewers to give higher ratings. And ratings are not a good
indicator as many do not rate a movie and non-raters might even be a majority. Generally,
ratings are given by viewers who either have loved the movie or have hated it.
The fence-sitters are not really bothered!
The OTT platforms even though driven by technology
are loathe to share numbers. I suspect that they do not want to admit that they
carry Duds (movies with hardly any viewership). So, the entire viewership issue
is swept under the carpet.
It must be disconcerting for the producers, directors,
actors, and technicians not to know the exact viewership details of the
movie in which they have invested so much money, time, and energy. At least YouTube
is transparent and anyone can know the viewership details with a mouse click.
Analytical sites like Social Blade furnish jaw-dropping
statistics about videos uploaded on YouTube but are totally silent on content
hosted on OTT as there is no data shared in the public domain.
The OTT annual charges are ridiculously
low. Maybe the OTT platforms are treating the first few years' subscription
charges as invitation pricing. Invitation pricing is a low price that would
hook the viewers and once the viewers are hooked and addicted the prices can be
jacked up. Time to open up and share information, OTT platforms!!!