Marketing
always excited me because it is the only subject in management that is live,
dynamic, and happening right in front of you. It’s always “in your face”. Brands
are constantly talking to us, and it’s up to us to decode what they are really
saying.
Every day, we are dished out hundreds of live case studies. We have the
lens to see them. Yesterday, when I picked up the Times of India, this
full-page Amul Mithai advertisement instantly struck me. I decided to use it in
my classroom session the same day.
The question I posed to my students was
simple yet powerful: “How much do you think this advertisement would have
cost across all editions of TOI in India?”
The
students’ jaws dropped when I revealed the figure – upwards of ₹3 crores! That’s when I told them
why brands like a local Karachi Bakery would never think of advertising at this
scale. Naturally, the next discussion was “Why such a big advertisement?”
Students
came up with some good responses:
- It’s seasonal.
- Amul wants to
highlight its presence in the sweets business.
- The brand wants to
showcase its portfolio.
- Perhaps they are
pushing online ordering.
- Or maybe they wanted
to launch new SKUs.
All valid,
but in my view, these answers were “seeing the trees but missing the forest.”
The critical thinking was still surface level. Here’s how I see it:
The
Bigger Marketing Picture
1. A
tectonic shift in sweet consumption: Amul is signalling the change in consumer
behavior. For a country that once prided itself on having sweets for every
occasion, consumption habits are evolving rapidly.
2. The
‘F-word’ of nutrition Sugar: Sweets are suddenly seen as the villain.
With India on its way to becoming the diabetes capital of the world,
consumers are cutting down or switching away.
3. From
bulk to bite-sized: Ten
years ago, a festival meant at least 5–8 kgs of sweets at home. Today, very few
make sweets at home, and even when gifted, they’re either re-gifted (the
infamous Soan Papdi loop!) or handed over to house help.
4. Quality
over quantity: Indians
are gravitating towards premium sweets. They don’t want 2 kgs of generic
laddoo; they want a few pieces of Kaju Katli.
5. Smart
price psychology: One
student, Lahari, made a sharp observation: the ad makes Kaju Katli look affordable
at Rs
230 for 200
grams. But when you scale it up , it’s Rs 1150 per kg! Smart price framing. Why haven’t local mithai shops done
this?
Because they stick to the traditional “Rs/kg” display which feels unaffordable
and pushes customers away.
6. Transparency
vs. bundling: Local
shops often sell ₹400–500/kg packs but fill
them with cheap options like boondi laddoo, jalebi, or Rava sweets. Milk and
khoa based sweets are minimized. With Amul, you know exactly what you’re buying a curated, premium
range.
7. Convenience
+ Gifting appeal: The
pack sizes are attractive, hygienic, and perfect for gifting. Small, manageable
packs ensure there’s no guilt or wastage. Consumers perceive these as indulgent
yet responsible purchases.
Why this
ad works This
is not just an ad – it’s a strategic brand play. Amul is:
- Repositioning mithai as modern,
hygienic, and aspirational.
- Using price
packaging strategy to make indulgence look affordable.
- Leveraging consumer
psychology by shifting the focus from per kg to per 200 grams.
- Tapping into gifting
economics where presentation matters as much as product.
In essence, Amul is telling
us: “Mithai is not dead; it just needs to be reimagined.” As a marketing
teacher, I see this campaign as a masterclass in consumer insight mining,
price framing, and product portfolio communication. All in all – a
brilliant move by AMUL.
Keywords:
Amul Mithai, Amul advertising, Amul sweets, marketing strategy, consumer insights, Indian sweets market, festive marketing, brand positioning, advertising cost India, Times of India ad, packaging strategy, pricing psychology, gifting trends, mithai consumption shift, premium sweets, quality vs quantity, sugar-free sweets, Indian consumer behavior, brand communication, FMCG marketing.